Abortion

Prevent Abortion in Lancaster!

Planned Parenthood Keystone has asked the Commonwealth for an exception to the rule requiring a transfer agreement with a local hospital.

This situation potentially puts women at serious risk of harm should abortion complications arise.

We need to make it clear to the Pennsylvania Department of Health that Planned Parenthood does not deserve an exception.

Please email ra-paexcept@pa.gov and let them know it would be dangerous to grant an exception to Planned Parenthood and that the plan needs to be stopped for the well-being of women in Lancaster.

READ MORE
Abortion

Pro-Abortion Takeover of PA House

             Recent special elections in Pennsylvania have helped to usher in a new era in the Keystone State—an era in which, sadly, preborn children and their mothers face new legislative attacks.

             With Democrats winning all three February special elections, the leadership of the PA House of Representatives is now in pro-abortion hands. As a result, citizens are bracing for a pro-abortion legislative assault from the lower chamber.

             Pro-abortion legislative leaders would like to dismantle the Abortion Control Act. That landmark law was the basis of the U.S. Supreme Court case Planned Parenthood v. Casey in 1992. The law not only served as a model for the rest of the nation, but also gave rise to hundreds of additional protections for preborn children and their mothers throughout the various states.

            The Abortion Control Act is a common sense law which provides for informed consent, parental consent, a 24-hour waiting period for abortions, a late-term abortion ban, and a ban on sex selection abortions.

             It will be incumbent on pro-life advocates in Pennsylvania to contact their state representatives and make the case that the ACA is a time-tested law and should not be changed. Ironically, the move to dismantle the ACA comes at a time when abortions are on the rise in PA—fueled by a dramatic increase in chemical abortions.

            Abortion facilities throughout the Commonwealth are also openly marketing to women in other states, hoping to boost their bottom lines with customers beyond Pennsylvania’s borders. Abortion business executives have made it clear—they want to expand abortion in Pennsylvania.   

  Statistics show 33,206 abortions took place in Pennsylvania in 2021, an increase of 1,083 abortions over the 2020 total of 32,123. Imagine how many kindergarten classes the number 1,083 represents. We mourn the loss of these precious children, who never got the chance to see their mother’s face.

             Thankfully, the Pennsylvania state Senate stands as a firewall against pro-abortion initiatives coming from a hostile PA House of Representatives and Governor’s Office. The upper chamber will no doubt be playing defense against what is expected to be a flurry of pro-abortion legislation coming from the PA House.

            Gratefully, PA is also home to a vibrant, energetic pro-life movement which stands ready to defend the most vulnerable among us—no matter what the political odds.

READ MORE
Abortion

Hyde Amendment Saves Lives

They had both been born in the same country, but never met until after each had migrated to the U.S. They were young and filled with hope when they married—a union which would lead to seven children.

He supported his family as a barber, but he found that, in times of economic downturn, customers could be hard to come by. At Christmastime, a local firehouse would provide gifts for his beloved children, who well knew the poverty of their state in life.

These were my Italian grandparents, Leonard and Theresa. They may have had little in material goods, but they had plenty of love to spare.

I think of them often when pro-abortion politicians threaten to take away the Hyde Amendment, which ensures no taxpayer funding of abortion except in the rare cases of rape, incest, and to save the life of the mother.

I think of my grandparents because, while materially poor, they were rich in principles. And they viewed each of their children as a treasure.

It is condescending and classist to claim that low-income people “need” abortion. What they need is material and emotional support for themselves and their families. It seems especially revolting if a pregnant woman needs help with her rent payment and she is instead extended a cold-hearted offer to take the life of her preborn child.

It has been estimated that 2.5 million Americans are alive today because of the Hyde Amendment. It has stood the test of time and should not be tampered with. Attacking the Hyde Amendment is an attack on people who lack basic resources. It is unconscionable, and should not be permitted in a civilized society.

READ MORE
Abortion

What The Doctors Didn’t Tell You: The Truth about Chemical Abortion

Recently two Philadelphia-area OB-GYNS penned an opinion piece extolling the safety of medication/chemical abortion which accounts for the majority of abortions both nationally and statewide.  In an attempt to normalize an extremely unnatural procedure, they omitted information that every young woman and the general public should know.

Chemical abortion involves a regimen of two pills. Mifepristone blocks progesterone, thereby cutting off nutrients to the developing (but indisputably human) living child. Misoprostol is taken a few days later to expel the child from the womb. The authors of the aforementioned piece claim that this is a “safe and easy” procedure.

Nothing can be further from the truth.

Chemical abortion has four times the complication rate of surgical abortion. (Charlotte Lozier Institute, July 2022).  As chemical abortions increase, so do complications.  According to PA abortion statistics released by the Department of Health, chemical abortions have increased 17% in the Commonwealth since 2017, but complications from abortions have increased 125% in the same time frame.

In approximately three quarters of the cases, the complication involves “retained products of conception.” In other words, parts of the child’s body remain in the mother’s womb, causing infection and potentially sepsis. Chemical abortion can also cause hemorrhaging that a young woman may not recognize as abnormal and dangerous.

At least 26 deaths have been attributed to chemical abortion by the FDA. But those deaths were overlooked in the doctors’ article as were the 4000 adverse effects reported between 2002-2015.  The rate of abortion-related emergency room visits following a chemical abortion increased over 500% during this time period, according to an analysis of Medicaid claims data. (Charlotte Lozier Institute, November 2021).

One might think that the percentage of deaths and complications is low given the widespread distribution of the abortion pill. But this is far from “settled science” because available data is incomplete.

In 2016 the Obama-era FDA lifted the reporting requirement for adverse effects for the abortion pill regimen. Currently, only 28 states require providers to report post-abortion complications. How can any doctor proclaim the safety of the abortion pill when we’ve stopped collecting data on how unsafe it can be?

The FDA has now permanently lifted the in-person examination requirement and has given the green light to retail pharmacies to dispense the abortion pill regimen.

Via a virtual visit or phone call, a desperate and fearful young woman can potentially answer a few questions before picking up the abortion pill at her neighborhood CVS or perhaps have it delivered to her by mail. Without any physical examination, either before or after the abortion.

Suspending the safety protocols that were once required raises troubling questions.

What if a woman is further along than she thinks? The FDA recommends chemical abortion only through the 10th week of pregnancy. Rates of complication increase as pregnancy progresses.

What if her pregnancy is ectopic? The abortion pill will not resolve this medical emergency and her life can be seriously endangered.

What if she is unknowingly carrying twins? She may deliver one child and not realize another remains in her womb.

What if she is unknowingly Rh negative? She may jeopardize her ability to have children in the future.

What if she is forever traumatized when she sees a tiny leg or hand or nose as she flushes away “her pregnancy tissue” that is really her child?

Chemical abortion may seem like an “easy” path out of an unexpected pregnancy. However, it is not without both short- and long-term physical and emotional risks, and more so now than ever.

Women in crisis deserve better than this distorted form of “medicine.” They deserve authentic tangible help that will support them through a pregnancy and beyond. And their unrepeatable children deserve the same chance at life that you, and I, and the abortion doctors have been given.

READ MORE
Abortion

Statement from the PA Pro-Life Federation on recent mailing

The Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation, the official PA affiliate of the National Right to Life Committee, has recently become aware of a mailing from a group identifying itself and soliciting donations as “Right to Life Pennsylvania”. The address on the mailing can be traced to a UPS store in Harrisburg. The letter was mailed from a zip code in Ohio. This group is affiliated with neither the Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation nor the National Right to Life Committee.

Please be aware that any communications from the Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation and the National Right to Life Committee will be clearly marked as such. We hope that this communication will clear up any confusion that has been caused in the wake of the mailing, which was not authorized by the Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation, the National Right to Life Committee, or any of their chapters or affiliates.

READ MORE
Abortion

PA Abortion Totals Rise But the Number Would be Much Higher Were It Not for Pregnancy Help

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                                CONTACT:  MARIA GALLAGHER, PPLF

January 2, 2023                                                                                    717-541-0034

HARRISBURG, PA—The number of abortions rose in Pennsylvania during the year 2021, according to figures released by the PA Department of Health.

 “Every abortion is a tragedy, but the increase in the number of abortions in Pennsylvania is particularly disturbing,” said Maria Gallagher, legislative director for the Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation, the Keystone State affiliate of National Right to Life.

 “Pennsylvania women deserve better than abortion, which is the taking of an innocent, unrepeatable human life. We need to invest more in services that empower pregnant women to make life-affirming decisions for themselves and their families,” Gallagher added.

 Statistics show 33,206 abortions took place in Pennsylvania in 2021, an increase of 1,083 abortions over the 2020 total of 32,123.

 “Imagine how many kindergarten classes the number 1,083 represents. We mourn the loss of these precious children, who never got the chance to see their mother’s face,” Gallagher said.

 The upsurge in abortion totals appears to be driven by the ever-rising number of chemical abortions, which now outnumber surgical abortions. The Department of Health states that 322 reports of complications from abortions were recorded in 2021—a dramatic increase of nearly 35 percent over the previous year’s totals.

 “Why are so many complications being reported? This is a public health problem that deserves immediate attention from Health Department officials,” Gallagher added.

 The number of abortions in Pennsylvania would be much higher were it not for Pennsylvania’s groundbreaking Pregnancy and Parenting Support Program, which provides comprehensive counseling and support for women facing unexpected pregnancies. The program, administered by Real Alternatives, has become a model for the rest of the nation.

 The statistics would also be higher were it not for the many other pregnancy resource centers throughout Pennsylvania, which offer everything from diapers to day care referrals, and from mentoring to maternity clothes to pregnant women in need.    

 The Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation is a grassroots right-to-life organization with members statewide.  As the state affiliate of National Right to Life, PPLF is committed to promoting the dignity and value of human life from conception to natural death and to restoring legal protection for preborn children.

READ MORE
Abortion

What We Love Says It All

I bet you too received a plethora of emails on Giving Tuesday that prompted, persuaded, and pleaded for your generous monetary support of non-profits.  Among those that happened to land in my inbox (due to oppositional research) was one from Planned Parenthood, and I found its subject line simply appalling.

Subject lines are an opportunity to stress the main takeaway of an email. Planned Parenthood’s happened to be “We love abortion” using a heart emoji to represent their devotion to abortion.

I was struck by the stark clarity of this statement. They don’t see abortion as a “necessary evil” or a procedure that should be rare. They offered no attempt to downplay being the largest provider of abortion in the nation.

Rather, they want us to know that they love abortion. And they want our donations (and tax dollars) so they can do more of them.

Consider what “We love abortion” implies.

They love death… Love ending an innocent life… Love disposing of tiny bodies into a medical waste bucket or a toilet… Love sending a young woman back into an unhealthy, possibly abusive relationship, or to a promiscuous lifestyle.

What they love more than anything, however, is likely the revenue that abortion helps to generate– over $1.7 billion according to their latest annual report. Surely they love that abortions are up 30,000 from the previous year, upping their daily death total to 1050 babies every single day.

I was also struck by the irony inherent in the subject line. They use a heart to represent their love of abortion when abortion actually stops a beating heart.

Equally ironic was the occasion for this email. Giving Tuesday promotes giving of oneself to help others. What does Planned Parenthood give? They are all about taking. Taking money, taking lives, taking advantage of people in vulnerable positions.

How can anyone love abortion, when by definition love is willing the good of the other? Isn’t the child killed the forgotten other?

By contrast, consider potential subject lines for pro-life organizations.  We love babies. We love women. We love helping. We love supporting. We love empowering.  We love life. We love you.

Love freely given to any mother in need at over 2700 pregnancy resource centers nationwide.

The Bible says for where your treasure is, there also will be your heart.

By their own admission, Planned Parenthood’s heart is in abortion because that is what fills their coffers. They love money and death more than the precious gift of life. And they are not ashamed to say it.

READ MORE
Abortion

Save the Baby Humans, Too!

While on vacation, we tend to sleep in.

But there we were at the crack of dawn, trekking to the beach, drawn to the promise of new life.

We were to meet up with locals trained in protecting loggerhead turtles, a species officially labeled as “vulnerable.” Mama turtle had buried her 100+ eggs about 60 days previously, using back fins to methodically sculpt a deep hole in which her progeny would be well-protected. Signs indicated that the eggs had begun to hatch and babies emerge.  But not all. Some required rescuing or they would die.

The golf cart brigade that monitors the nests every morning staged an intervention. They would dig out the buried babies and set them on a path to life into the ocean. And they welcomed us to share in the experience.

We stood on the periphery, watching the team carefully dig into the deepest pockets of the nest. Anticipation was building.  Digging and more digging. Finally, the announcement—a baby was found! Cheers erupted. We crowded around, eager to glimpse the little survivor.

And then more babies. And more. We marveled at each and every teeny turtle, rejoicing in their saved lives.

We then helped to place about three dozen babies on the beach facing the water.  We watched their painstaking crawl to their new home, a struggle necessary for developing the stamina and strength needed for ocean survival.

It was a beautiful experience. A different kind of pro-life moment, yet one that parallels the heroic efforts made every day to rescue baby humans.

Like these naturalists, trained volunteers and dedicated employees invest time and pool resources to save human babies from death by abortion, rejoicing at each and every life saved and mother supported.

“Save the baby humans” could very well be the mantra of the 2700 pregnancy resource centers throughout our country. Countless people are alive today because of their efforts to support a mother and her child, both before birth and after.

In 2019 alone, pregnancy resource centers served roughly 2 million women, men, and youth with nearly $270 million in services at little or no cost, according to the Charlotte Lozier Institute.

But ironically, while those who save baby turtles are universally acclaimed for their good work, those who strive to protect helpless, vulnerable human babies are being vilified.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren has grossly mischaracterized pregnancy resource centers, calling for them to be shut down across the country. Dozens of centers have been vandalized and even firebombed by abortion extremists, destroying material goods and delaying counseling services that actually empower the very women that abortion advocates claim to care about.

It’s mind-boggling that some people who regard the destruction of a turtle egg as egregiously immoral have no problem with the purposeful destruction of human life.

Since the Endangered Species Act was passed in 1973, the same year Roe had been decided, pre-born turtles have had more legal protections than pre-born humans.

We can and should protect both.

Like baby turtles, some baby humans require rescuing or they will die.  Pregnancy resource centers provide the intervention.  They rescue innocent children, a “vulnerable species,” from a violent death by abortion. They provide the needed support for mother and baby, digging them out of their own proverbial hole, setting them on a path for life, and rejoicing in the unique gift of every single human life.

In this post-Roe world, we need to ask ourselves a question:

If we encounter pre-born humans at risk of dying, would we do less to save them than we do for pre-born turtles?

READ MORE
Abortion

PA Lawmaker Seeks to Expand Abortion

The days of the slogan “safe, legal, and rare” are long gone in Pennsylvania. Some lawmakers make no secret of the fact that they do not want abortion to be rare–in fact, they are making every effort to increase abortions in the Commonwealth.

A co-sponsorship memo by state Rep. Dan Frankel (D-Allegheny County) is the latest example of this disturbing trend.

The proof lies in the subject line of the memo: “Expanding Access to Abortion.”

Rep. Frankel wants to expand the “pool of providers” by having non-doctors perform abortions. As he states, “I am introducing legislation that would allow physician assistants, nurse-midwives, and certified registered nurse practitioners to prescribe medication abortion.”

He is referring to chemical abortions, which are rapidly eclipsing surgical abortions as the leading cause of death of preborn babies in Pennsylvania. A number of legitimate safety concerns–both physical and psychological– have been raised about chemical abortions for mothers.

Rep. Frankel is in the minority in the PA House of Representatives, but abortion giant Planned Parenthood is doing its best to change that, pouring countless dollars into campaigns to replace pro-life lawmakers with pro-abortion zealots. This is why it is incumbent upon voters to know the stands of office-seekers when it comes to the life-or-death issue of abortion.

Pennsylvania is home to a staggering 32,000 abortions each year.
We cannot afford policies that seek to expand that number even further.

READ MORE
Abortion

A Ring Symbolizing Life

I wear on my finger a symbol of the Culture of Life.

It is a ring with two dates: 1972, the year before the tragic U.S. Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade was decided, and 2022, the year Roe was finally overturned.

The ring comes courtesy of COL (Culture of Life) 1972, a family owned and operated company in Pennsylvania. The company offers clothing and other merchandise which celebrates the incomparable gift of life. It was founded as an alternative to retailers that support Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion operation.

Each time I look at the ring, I am reminded of the nearly 50-year struggle to rescind a dangerous and lethal Supreme Court ruling. I mourn the more than 63 million preborn children who died as a result of that traumatic decision.

But I also have tremendous hope–that wrongs can be righted…that bad decisions can be reversed…and that compassion and sanity can be restored.

In essence, I wear an unusual type of promise ring–a symbol of the promise of the beauty of life. I wear the ring in expectation of a future in which each preborn baby and her mother are treasured and protected, and life is respected as a fundamental good.

READ MORE